🧫 Lab

Live validation results, spring science hubs, and sovereign compute access. 13 primals, 13,648+ checks, 8 springs, full provenance. Run it yourself or review the evidence.

The lab is where ecoPrimals science gets validated on real hardware. Everything here ran on a sovereign compute node (i9-14900K, 96 GB DDR5, RTX 4070 / RTX 3090 / Akida NPU) through a live 13-primal NUCLEUS composition. Every result carries a cryptographic provenance chain: BLAKE3 content hashes β†’ rhizoCrypt DAG β†’ loamSpine ledger β†’ sweetGrass ed25519-witnessed braid.

Security status: All 13 primals default 127.0.0.1 bind. BTSP Phase 3 AEAD on all connections. NestGate method-level auth gating. JH-0 MethodGate adopted 13/13 primals. 445 registered capability methods. Zero DEBT markers (primalSpring Wave 35).


Spring Science

Each spring validates a scientific domain. These pages tell the full story β€” what was reproduced, what was discovered, and what it proved about the infrastructure.

SpringDomainChecksPapers
wetSpringLife science, metagenomics, PFAS5,707+63/63
hotSpringPlasma physics, lattice QCD, spectral697+10+
airSpringPrecision agriculture, irrigation2,777+57
healthSpringPK/PD, microbiome, biosignal, drugs7957 tracks
groundSpringMeasurement noise, uncertainty, Anderson965+29 baselines
primalSpringComposition parity, deploy graphs, NUCLEUS666β€” (meta-spring)

2 more springs (neuralSpring, ludoSpring) are documented in the Spring Catalog and are being expanded by upstream contributors.

Total across all 8 springs: 14,314+ quantitative checks, 70+ peer-reviewed papers reproduced, 15 researchers across 9 departments.


Validation & Provenance

Validation results — 235+ structured science checks across 8 workloads, dispatched through ToadStool on a live composition. Real NCBI data (11.9M paired-end reads) processed through both Python and Rust pipelines. Python→Rust parity at machine-epsilon precision.

Provenance evidence β€” every artifact content-addressed, every pipeline step tracked in a DAG session, committed to a permanent ledger, and witnessed with ed25519 signatures. The braid is PROV-O compliant with DID attribution.

Reproduce it yourself β€” step-by-step instructions to stand up the same composition on your own hardware and run the same workloads. No cloud. No institutional access. Commodity hardware.


The Validation Pattern

Published results (papers, databases, NCBI)
        ↓
Python / established tools (QIIME2, SciPy, R vegan/phyloseq)
        ↓
Rust implementation (wetSpring, barraCuda)
        ↓
NUCLEUS composition dispatch (toadStool execute)
        ↓
Provenance chain (BLAKE3 β†’ DAG β†’ ledger β†’ braid)
        ↓
Parity check + gap report

Each arrow is independently verifiable. The Rust matches the Python. The composition matches standalone Rust. Gaps are documented and flow upstream. Every successful workload is proof that the deploy graphs, BTSP encryption, discovery hierarchy, and provenance pipeline work in production.


Public Notebooks

Interactive Jupyter notebooks that visualize baseCamp science. Each notebook loads frozen experiment data (JSON artifacts) from the spring repositories β€” no live primals required.

NotebookSpringStory
16S Pipeline ValidationwetSpringFlagship 16S pipeline, Galaxy/QIIME2 parity, R/vegan cross-validation
Python vs Rust vs GPUwetSpringBenchmark evidence: timing, energy, speedup across three tiers
63/63 Paper ReproductionswetSpring5 researchers, 6 tracks, full evidence map
Cross-Spring ConnectionswetSpring79 barraCuda primitives, constraint-driven discoveries
Soil Anderson Deep DivewetSpringAnderson localization in soil biology β€” physics meets ecology
Composition ValidationgroundSpring6 deploy graphs, guideStone Level 3, verb reconciliation
Benchmark ComparisongroundSpringRust vs Python timing, three-mode GPU, 110 barraCuda delegations
Ecosystem EvidencegroundSpring35 experiments, 10 domains, gap resolution, security posture
Cross-Spring ConnectionsgroundSpring5 primals consumed, 7 ecosystem flows, patterns pioneered
Measurement Science Deep DivegroundSpringFive pillars, 13-tier tolerance architecture, Anderson thread
Composition ValidationprimalSpringDeploy graphs, bond types, profiles, discovery tiers
Benchmark ComparisonprimalSpringRust vs Python timing, energy, guidestone phases
Ecosystem EvidenceprimalSpring85 experiments, gap resolution, security timeline
Cross-Spring ConnectionsprimalSpringPrimal consumption matrix, ecosystem flows
BTSP Security Deep DiveprimalSpringPer-primal posture, convergence arc, discovery hierarchy

Run them yourself: Clone the spring, cd notebooks/, jupyter lab. Or access via JupyterHub.


Compute Access

JupyterHub provides multi-user notebook access to the live 13-primal composition. Every notebook runs against real primals, not mocks. Three access tiers (observer, reviewer, user) ensure open science with appropriate boundaries.


For PIs and Reviewers

The lab is the evidence record for the projectFOUNDATION protocol. If you’re evaluating ecoPrimals for institutional adoption:

  1. Review the spring science hubs β€” each spring page shows what was reproduced and how
  2. Check the provenance pipeline β€” every result is content-addressed with cryptographic chains
  3. Request reviewer access β€” read-only JupyterHub access to see the live workspace
  4. Run it yourself β€” the reproduction guide works on commodity hardware, no institutional access needed

The shared workspace at /shared/abg/showcase/ contains polished results ready for institutional review.


For ABG Members

If you’re in the Accelerated Bioinformatics Group, the lab is also your on-ramp. The same pipelines that produced these results are available through JupyterHub via the compute sharing tunnel. Your workloads run on the same composition, with the same provenance. Your science validates the infrastructure; the infrastructure validates your science.

See Compute Access for how to connect, or Reproduce It Yourself to run this on your own hardware.